 |
Article dans une revue
Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon
Abstract : Background. - The frequency of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) varies widely across studies. The impact of misalignment of aortic flow and pressure recovery phenomenon on the frequency of low-gradient severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. Aims. - To investigate prospectively the impact of aortic flow misalignment by Doppler and lack of pressure recovery phenomenon correction on the frequency of low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LVEF. Methods. - Aortic jet velocities and mean pressure gradient (MPG) were obtained by interrogating all windows in 68 consecutive patients with normal LVEF and severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] <= 1 cm(2)) on the basis of the apical imaging window alone (two-dimensional [2D] apical approach). Patients were classified as having LG or high-gradient (HG) AS according to MPG < 40 mmHg or >= 40 mmHg, and normal flow (NF) or low flow (LF) according to stroke volume index > 35 mL/m(2) or <= 35 mL/m(2), on the basis of the 2D apical approach, the multiview approach (multiple windows evaluation) and AVA corrected for pressure recovery. Results. - The proportion of LG severe AS was 57% using the 2D apical approach alone. After the multiview approach and correction for pressure recovery, the proportion of LG severe AS decreased from 57% to 13% (LF-LG severe AS decreased from 23% to 3%; NF-LG severe AS decreased from 34% to 10%). As a result, 25% of patients were reclassified as having HG severe AS (AVA <= 1 cm(2) and MPG >= 40 mmHg) and 19% as having moderate AS. Hence, 77% of patients initially diagnosed with LG severe AS did not have ``true'' LG severe AS when the multiview approach and the pressure recovery phenomenon correction were used. Conclusions. - Aortic flow misevaluation, resulting from lack of use of multiple windows evaluation and pressure recovery phenomenon correction, accounts for a large proportion of incorrectly graded AS and considerable overestimation of the frequency of LG severe AS with preserved LVEF. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
https://hal-u-picardie.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03580334
Contributeur : Louise Dessaivre Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : vendredi 18 février 2022 - 15:33:15
Dernière modification le : mardi 26 avril 2022 - 13:50:02
Contributeur : Louise Dessaivre Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : vendredi 18 février 2022 - 15:33:15
Dernière modification le : mardi 26 avril 2022 - 13:50:02
Lien texte intégral
