Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Twenty-Year Outcome After Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Analysis of a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, International Registry

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement in clinical guidelines and is an important determinant of the indication for surgery in degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the level of evidence supporting current recommendations is low, and recent data cast doubts on its validity in the current era. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to analyze very long-term outcome after MV repair and replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet. METHODS: MIDA (Mitral Regurgitation International Database) is a multicenter registry enrolling patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet in 6 tertiary European and US centers. We analyzed the outcome after MV repair (n= 1709) and replacement (n= 213) overall, by propensity score matching, and by inverse probability-of-treatment weighting. RESULTS: At baseline, patients undergoing MV repair were younger, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to present with a posterior leaflet prolapse than those undergoing MV replacement. After propensity score matching and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting, the 2 treatments groups were balanced, and absolute standardized differences were usually < 10%, indicating adequate match. Operative mortality (defined as a death occurring within 30 days from surgery or during the same hospitalization) was lower after MV repair than after replacement in both the entire population (1.3% versus 4.7%; P< 0.001) and the propensity-matched population (0.2% versus 4.4%; P< 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 552 deaths were observed, of which 207 were of cardiovascular origin. Twenty-year survival was better after MV repair than after MV replacement in both the entire population (46% versus 23%; P< 0.001) and the matched population (41% versus 24%; P< 0.001). Similar superiority of MV repair was obtained in patient subsets on the basis of age, sex, or any stratification criteria (all P< 0.001). MV repair was also associated with reduced incidence of reoperations and valve-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet referred to mitral surgery, MV repair was associated with lower operative mortality, better long-term survival, and fewer valve-related complications compared with MV replacement.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-u-picardie.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03580725
Contributeur : Louise DESSAIVRE Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : vendredi 18 février 2022 - 16:57:03
Dernière modification le : jeudi 25 août 2022 - 14:36:25

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Siham Lazam, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde, Christophe Tribouilloy, Francesco Grigioni, Rakesh M. Suri, et al.. Twenty-Year Outcome After Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Analysis of a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, International Registry. Circulation, American Heart Association, 2017, 135 (5), pp.410+. ⟨10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023340⟩. ⟨hal-03580725⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

20