Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Ellipsoid Calculations versus Manual Tumor Delineations for Glioblastoma Tumor Volume Evaluation.

Abstract : In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determine the size of different glioblastoma regions of interest: the contrast-enhancing area, the necrotic area, the gross target volume and the volume of the edema area. The two methods, the ellipsoid formula (the calculated method) and the manual delineation (the measured method) showed a high correlation to determine glioblastoma volume and a high agreement to classify patients assessment response to treatment according to RANO criteria. This study revealed that calculated and measured methods could be used in clinical practice to estimate glioblastoma volume size and to evaluate tumor size evolution.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-u-picardie.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03703794
Contributeur : Louise DESSAIVRE Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : vendredi 24 juin 2022 - 12:02:16
Dernière modification le : vendredi 5 août 2022 - 11:25:58

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Citation

Clara Le Fèvre, Roger Sun, Hélène Cebula, Alicia Thiery, Delphine Antoni, et al.. Ellipsoid Calculations versus Manual Tumor Delineations for Glioblastoma Tumor Volume Evaluation.. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12 (1), pp.10502. ⟨10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4⟩. ⟨hal-03703794⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

15