Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Surgery Année : 2022

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching

(1) , (2) , (3, 4, 5) , , (6) , , (7, 8) , (9, 7) , , (10, 11) , (9, 7) , (12) , (13) , (3) , , , (14) , (15, 16) , (9) , (17) , (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Raffaele Brustia
Serena Langella
  • Fonction : Auteur
Takayuki Kawai
  • Fonction : Auteur
Olivier Farges
  • Fonction : Auteur
Stefan Hofmeyr
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alessandro Ferrero
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence. Methods: Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described. Results: During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre-and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence. Conclusion: The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03745873 , version 1 (04-08-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Raffaele Brustia, Alexis Laurent, Claire Goumard, Serena Langella, Daniel Cherqui, et al.. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching. Surgery, 2022, 171 (5), pp.1290-1302. ⟨10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015⟩. ⟨hal-03745873⟩
15 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More